Independent research and innovation platform. Not an NHS organisation or NHS-endorsed service.
Provider benchmarking

Use variation to decide where to investigate, not who to blame.

The first national study uses July 2026 NHS England discharge-ready-date data. Rankings are investigation signals only and do not prove waste, poor care or recoverable savings.

Providers128

Provider records

4,096 provider measure rows used.
Median0.89 days

Average delay

Provider median after discharge readiness.
Upper quartile1.18 days

Average delay

25% of included providers sit above this level.
Same day85.3%

Median rate

Discharged on the recorded ready date.
Investigation signals

Where is delay materially above the national pattern?

Minimum 100 discharges. These are prompts for operational investigation.

ProviderAverage delayDelayed bed daysSame day21+ days
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS SUSSEX NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
SOUTH EAST
2.16 days12,73684.9%3.4%
EAST SUSSEX HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST
SOUTH EAST
2.15 days5,56275.3%2.9%
JAMES PAGET UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
EAST OF ENGLAND
2.07 days2,70573.3%2.4%
SOMERSET NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
SOUTH WEST
2.00 days6,86980.8%2.6%
MEDWAY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
SOUTH EAST
1.96 days3,51776.4%1.7%
COUNTESS OF CHESTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
NORTH WEST
1.89 days3,23183.8%2.8%
NORTH CHESHIRE AND MERSEY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
NORTH WEST
1.78 days2,84983.3%2.6%
ISLE OF WIGHT NHS TRUST
SOUTH EAST
1.68 days1,54370.2%1.4%
NORTHAMPTON GENERAL HOSPITAL NHS TRUST
MIDLANDS
1.66 days3,78472.9%1.2%
PORTSMOUTH HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS TRUST
SOUTH EAST
1.66 days6,27175.7%1.6%
Counterfactual screen

What sits above a simple national-median scenario?

This is an investigative screen only, not a savings forecast.

Review signal

UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS SUSSEX NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

7,501

Bed days above the simple monthly median counterfactual.

Review signal

SOMERSET NHS FOUNDATION TRUST

3,811

Bed days above the simple monthly median counterfactual.

Review signal

EAST SUSSEX HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST

3,263

Bed days above the simple monthly median counterfactual.

Review signal

MERSEY AND WEST LANCASHIRE TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST

3,146

Bed days above the simple monthly median counterfactual.

Review signal

PORTSMOUTH HOSPITALS UNIVERSITY NHS TRUST

2,912

Bed days above the simple monthly median counterfactual.

Review signal

LEEDS TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS TRUST

2,577

Bed days above the simple monthly median counterfactual.

Benchmarking rules, source coverage and verified examples

No crude league tables

  • Compare like with like: acute teaching trusts, district general hospitals, specialist trusts and community providers should not be ranked as one undifferentiated group.
  • Use rates and denominators, not raw counts alone.
  • Require a minimum activity volume before flagging an outlier.
  • Separate case-mix and structural constraints from avoidable operational variation.
  • Show trend alongside current position so improving providers are not labelled solely by historic performance.
  • Never convert statistical variation directly into cashable savings without pathway-level validation.
  • Flag data-quality limitations and methodology breaks explicitly.
  • Use benchmark variation to trigger investigation, not to declare poor care.

Available benchmark sources

Examples of improvement

Theatres

Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

232 additional patients treated between April and December 2024; daily cases rose from 2.8 to 3.5; lists overrunning materially reduced

This is evidence that better scheduling and visibility can convert theatre time into additional treated patients. It is a case study, not a national effect estimate.

Source ↗
Theatres

Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Scheduling information was consolidated from fragmented spreadsheets and systems, reducing manual administrative work and improving theatre planning

The operational lesson is that data fragmentation itself consumes staff time and weakens scheduling decisions even before clinical capacity loss is counted.

Source ↗
Benchmarking should answer one question: where is variation large enough that somebody should investigate why?