What existing evidence establishes
NHS programmes and published studies already show that medicine route, formulation, preparation and delivery model can materially alter nursing preparation time, pharmacy workload and treatment-chair capacity.
The NHS has already shown that medicine route, formulation, preparation and delivery model can change nursing, pharmacy, chair and bed resource. Sitora's job is to find those opportunities systematically and verify the local result.
NHS England reports that a home subcutaneous cancer-treatment programme delivered 2,520 injections for 196 patients and released 2,520 hospital chair-hours, with no serious safety incidents reported in the programme summary.
What this proves: Changing route and location can release real treatment-chair capacity in an NHS service.
Limitation: This is one programme and should not be generalised to every medicine, cancer pathway or patient cohort.
View source ↗The evidence proves the mechanism is credible. It does not prove that this trust will achieve the same effect.
Eligibility, administration location, chair hours avoided, staff time, travel burden, adverse events and whether released slots are actually reused.
Published evidence can trigger an investigation. Only observed local change can become a Sitora recovery record.
Clinical eligibility confirmed; actual route/formulation/preparation recorded; staff and chair/bed resource measured before and after; safety and patient outcomes monitored; additional workload counted; released capacity shown to be reusable; and any cash claim independently validated by finance.
The published evidence supports the problem or intervention mechanism. A Sitora pilot must establish the local effect.
NHS programmes and published studies already show that medicine route, formulation, preparation and delivery model can materially alter nursing preparation time, pharmacy workload and treatment-chair capacity.
A systematic intelligence layer that scans for those opportunities across a provider's medicines pathways, links each opportunity to relevant evidence, and routes only clinically eligible candidates into measured implementation.
Whether the same opportunity exists locally; the true before-and-after staff, chair or bed resource; safety and patient outcomes; additional workload created; whether released capacity is actually reused; and whether any monetary effect is cash-releasing, cost avoidance or capacity only.